An Unexpected Journey

Standard

Here’s a departure from what I usually cover on this blog. Bear with me?

I have a confession to make:

I am a Lord of the Rings geek, a writer, and an English teacher, yet I have never read The Hobbit.

Terrible, I know. I did see the old animated film back when I was in middle school, and I can imagine the encounter with Smaug and the Battle of the Five Armies very well. But I don’t really recall the actual journey to The Lonely Mountain at all!

So, in preparation for the Peter Jackson film coming out soon, I decided to finally read the book. I’m about half way through now, and I’m enjoying it. But I have a few questions about how it will be adapted for film.

1.) How will Thorin and the dwarves be portrayed? They’re a bunch a whiney, Gandalf-dependent wusses right now. Gimli would be ashamed.

2.) How many of the songs will be cut–all of them, like in LOTR? And how will the riddle contest play out between Bilbo and Gollum? As is, these are important to the story but probably won’t play well on film.

3.) What new adventures and lore will Jackson include to make a trilogy of movies out of a single book?

Have you done more research and thinking than me? Can you answer these questions with links or speculation? I’m looking forward to the movie, that’s fo sure!

About these ads

One of My Favorite Things: A Love Supreme

Standard

I won’t pretend to know a ton about jazz. Like many a listener, I don’t always know what’s going on, but I do know what I like.  John Coltrane’s seminal A Love Supreme is a perfect example of this.  I started listening to jazz around the time I started studying Buddhism.  (What can I say, I was faking my way through graduate school and being a beatnik.)  My first time playing the disc was after waking up early to read Zen koans, hopping in the car the car, and driving two hours in the rain to take karate class.

Maybe I was spiritually switched on that day, or maybe I was just overtired, but I think the emotion I felt–and still feel–when I heard the gong and opening fanfare through ego-shredding solos to the final notes of “Psalm” really moved me.   It was the first time I’d cried since childhood.  I had never felt so free, and anytime I get stuck in my own “selfness” I reach for this album.  If you’ve never listened to it, I suggest you give it a try!

Anyway, here’s a great NPR story on the record.  Take a minute to read it for some great insight into what makes it so great.

The Story of “A Love Supreme”

How I Became a Stephen King Fan

Standard

He looks coy because he knows he's awesome.

For years, I managed to be an avid reader, an English teacher, and a so-so friend while avoiding the Maine man of the American literary landscape, Stephan King.  I never liked horror and always had stacks of other uber-imaginative writers like Phillip Pullman, Douglass Adams, and Suzanne Collins to get through–authors sure to appease my need to read and discuss fantastic adventures with students and book buddies.  So I lived blissfully ignorant of one of the best selling authors of all time.

Stupid, I know.

But then my boss, apparently sensing my vitamin-K deficiency, gave me 11/22/63 for Christmas and everything changed.

I mean, check out the cover.  We’re allowed to judge it, right?  Newsprint? Blood? Alternate histories?  It seems to combine the highlights of the other three aforementioned authors.  In that, it succeeds: this is one hell of a page-turner.

 

I’m pleased to say this 849-page romp through time and across country reads as fast as your favorite comic book.  While King’s protagonist, Jake Epping, is no Hiro Nakamura, his commitment to changing the past for the better is just as exciting and even more epic.  The story unfolds as Epping (like me, a friendly neighborhood English teacher) entertains his friend’s invitation to visit “The Nifty Fifties” just to see what it’s like.  A massive quest begins from there, as in every good time-travel story.

I hereby certify this review is sans spoilers, but I can freely divulge that the plot involves trying to stop the Kennedy assassination.  (You know what would happen when you saw Titanic, right?)  King mentions he’s been researching this book since he started writing in the 70′s, and, given the amount and accuracy of his research–including his ability to account for decades of conspiracy theories–he manages to capture the paradoxical congeniality and anxiety of the age with aplomb.

King’s greatest accomplishment, however, is to explore the moral gray areas around how to think about the past.  If victors write history, then time travelers (i.e. writers and historians) have a responsibility recreate the past in a more neutral way so readers can make their own interpretations.  While the protagonist struggles like Hamlet throughout the book whether to change the past or not, we are invited to agonize along with him.  As an acolyte in the Church of King, I’m not sure if his other writings do this, but I appreciate an adventure than leaves readers’ with some breathing room.

Janet Maslin of the New York Times says of King: “he has lately written with more heart and soul, leaving the phantasmagorical grisliness behind.”  This change of style is what drew me in, and the incredible effort of making this narrative work is what got me to the quantum leap along with Epping.  With additions to the cannon like Under the Dome and the expansion of the classic The Dark Tower series, I’m glad to be a new fan with a lot to look forward to!

This is a call to Stephen King fans new and old: What should I read next?